SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 102

KURIAN JOSEPH
V. Aisha Kunju – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director of Education – Respondent


Judgment :-

A few questions affecting the pensioners, both retiring from service and retiring from life arise in this writ petition. What is the situation of a retired employee dying without submitting a formal application for pension? What is the date of effect of family pension under the liberalised family pension scheme? Date of death of the pensioner? Date of application? 01-01-1986 when the scheme was implemented?

2. Petitioner has two grievances: (1) non disbursement of the pensionary benefits due to her late husband K. Jaggafar; and (2) non disbursement of family pension under the liberalised family pension scheme with effect from 1-1-1986. Late Jaggafar was a Drill Teacher in an aided school, of which the 3rd respondent is the headmaster. He retired from service in March 1963. He retired from life on 12-12-1968. Till his death or even thereafter no orders were passed with regard to the pensionary benefits. It is not in dispute that Jaggafar was entitled to pension. The reason stated for not sanctioning the pension was that the Teacher had applied for the pension only after his retirement. It is profitable to refer to the statement filed on behalf of the first respondent Depu


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top