SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 94

Judges : K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR,J.M.JAMES
Rasi @ Ummer Farook - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : Crl.A.No.76 of 2003, 854 of 2003, 1187 of 2002 & 1199 of 2002
Decided On : 03/10/2004
Advocates Appeared :
For the Appellant: P.Vijaya Bhanu, P.M.Rafiq, P.M. Kunju Moideenkutty, Lai K. Joseph, Devaprasanth P.J., M. Asokan, K.V. Rashmi, Advocates. For the Respondents: Sujith Mathew Jose, Public Prosecutor.

Headnote:

Criminal Trial – Appellants in these appeals, accused 1 to 7, in S.C. No.301/2001, on the file of the Sessions Court, Kozhikode, have been charged for the offences punishable under Ss.143, 147, 148, 341, 506(ii) and 302 IPC read with S.149 I.P.C., and also for the offences punishable under S.27(2) and (3) of Indian Arms Act, 1959. Accused 1 to 5 were convicted for all the offences charged against them under I.P.C., and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years respectively under S.148 and S.506(ii), and for life imprisonment under S.302 I.P.C., with a fine of Rs. 25,000 in default of which to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years –Held, court case that there was an altercation earlier cannot be of any avail to him to shift the crime from S.302 I.P.C. to any other section including S.304 I.P.C., because earlier altercation was between the deceased and the second accused, and not between the deceased and the first accused – Court allow Crl.A. Nos. 854/2003, 1187 of 2002 and 1199 of 2002 .

Judgment :-

K.A. Abdul Gafoor, J.

Appellants in these appeals, accused 1 to 7, in S.C.No.301/2001, on the file of the Sessions Court, Kozhikode, have been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 506(ii) and 302 I.P.C. read with Sec. 149 I.P.C. and also for the offences punishable under Sections 27(2) & (3) of Indian Arms Act, 1959. Accused 1 to 5 were convicted for all the offences charged against them under I.P.C. and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years respectively under Sec. 148 and Sec.506(ii), and for life imprisonment under Sec.302 I.P.C., with a fine of Rs.25,000/- in default of which to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. They also have been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month under Sec. 341 I.P.C. Accused 6 and 7 were convicted for all the offences charged under I.P.C., except 302 I.P.C., and sentenced on same terms as above. Accused 2 to 7 were also convicted under Sections 27(2) & (3) of the Arms Act, and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years. This conviction is under challenge in these appeals. Crl.A.No.76/2003 is by Accused 1 to 3. Crl.A.No.1187/2002 is by Accused 4 and 6. Crl.A.No.854/2003 is by the 5th accused and Crl.A.No.1199/2002 is by the 7th accused. The contentions urged by the counsel appearing in these appeals are almost same, mainly assailing the identity of the person as spoken to by PWs. 1,4 and 9. They also assail the recovery effected in bulk from the residence of the third accused.

2. The alleged incident happened as follows. During night on 4.3.1998, Alex Jacob, PW.4 Biju and CW.3 Ratheesh, met in a bar Hotel called ‘Hotel Maharani’. After taking liquor, they came to Mavoor Road to take food from a bunk shop near the footpath. There they saw the second accused quarrelling with PW.12, and alleged night flower, Suharabi. Alex Jacob intervened in their quarrel, and asked the second accused to leave PW.12 alone. This resulted in push and pull between the second accused and Alex Jacob, as a result of which, the second accused fell down. Accused 1,3,4 and 5 were also present at that time. First Accused threatened the said Alex Jacob, and all of them, A1 to A5, went towards westwards. Few minutes later, accused persons came to the scene of occurrence, first accused carrying M.O.1 dagger, and others carrying swords, identified as M.O.2 series. There were wordly altercations between the two groups. It was at that time, PW.1 came in a motor bike. He identified Alex Jacob as his classmate, and therefore, tried to intervene in the quarrel. It was at that time, 5th accused threatened PW-1 by wielding the sword in his hand. When PW.1 withdrew, the first accused stabbed on the chest, below the collar bone with M.O.1 dagger, of the Alex Jacob. On getting the stab injury, the said Alex Jacob ran towards the east and the accused persons went towards west. PW.1 and others hospitalized the injured Alex Jacob. When brought to the hospital, the Doctor certified Alex Jacob dead. Immediately, PW.1 launched Ext.P1 F.I. Statement at about 3.00 A.M. on 5.3.1998 to PW.8. the head constable of Kasaba Police Station, Kozhikode. He registered Ext.P1(a) F.I.R. PW.15, the Circle Inspector of Police, undertook the investigation. Therefore, the investigation was completed by PW.17 who was the successor in office of PW.16. PW.17 laid the charges.

3. The prosecution examined 18 witnesses, and marked 25 documents. M.O.S. 1 to 12 were also identified. PWs2. 1,4 and 9 are the ocular witnesses. The identity of the persons were not revealed by either the first informant or the witnesses questioned by the police. This required Test identification Parade. This was conducted by Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kozhikode, upon orders from the Chief judicial Magistrate. After appreciating the evidence on record, the court below found the accused guilty as aforesaid, and passed sentences as mentioned above.

4. It is contented by the a





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top