SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 189

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
E. Rajarathinam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment :-

The appellants in these appeals faced conviction in C.C.No.6/95 on the file of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thiruvananthapuram. Crl.A.No.660/96 is by the second accused and Crl.A.No.704/96 is by the first accused. They faced trial for offences punishable under Section 5 (1)(c)(d) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short “the Act”) and Sections 409,468,471,and 477 A read with Section 120 B of the Indian Penal Code. The first accused has been convicted for the offences under the Act and also for offences punishable under Sections 465,477 and 477 A read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. He has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under Sections 465 and 471, for a period of one year each under Sections 477 A and 120 B and for a period of three years each under Section 409 and under the provisions of the said Act. The second accused has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under Sections 465 and 471, and for a period of one year each under Sections 477A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. This





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top