SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 528

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, K.THANKAPPAN
Jose – Appellant
Versus
Antony – Respondent


Judgment :-

Radhakrishnan, J.

Tenants are the revision petitioners. Eviction was sought for by the respondent – landlord under section 11(8) of Act 2 of 1965. Tenanted premises form part of a two storeyed building. Landlord is occupying northernmost room on the ground floor. Tenant in C.R.P.No.1700 of 2002 is occupying southernmost room in the ground floor. Tenant in C.R.P.No.1745 of 2002 is occupying middle room in the ground floor. Upstair portion is in the occupation of the tenant in C.R.P.No.1750 of 2002. Building is facing the main road situated near a bus stand. Landlord is carrying on hotel business by name “Aiswarya Restaurant”. Landlord purchased the building in the year 1995 while he was tenant of the building along with other tenants. He bonafide required the tenanted premises for expansion of his hotel business and for additional accommodation for the existing hotel.

2. Tenants resisted the petition contending that the need is not bonafide and there is no necessity of additional accommodation. Further they also stated that the attempt of the landlord is for getting enhanced rent. Rent Control Court and the Appellate Authority on the basis of the oral and documentary evide














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top