Cyriac Joseph, J.

1. This appeal is against the judgment in OP.No.2638 of 2003. The challenge in the original petition was against Ext.P7 notice proposing to supersede the Board of Directors of the Vaikom Palliprathusserry Service Co-Operative Bank Limited No.923. Ext.P7 being a show cause notice the learned Single Judge did not think it proper or fair to interfere with the said notice. The learned Single Judge observed that it was for the petitioners in the original petition to show cause and to contest the matter before the Joint Registrar. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there was every likelihood of an order being passed against the petitioners and an administrator being appointed so as to take over the administration of the society without affording effective opportunity to the petitioners for challenging the order in appropriate proceedings. In view of the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners the learned Single Judge thought it just and proper as it was seen done in a number of other cases to direct that the order to be passed by the joint Registrar under Section 32 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act shall be