SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 658

C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Jose Kuttiyani – Appellant
Versus
High Court – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioner is a practising Advocate of this Court and is also a member of the Kerala High Court Advocates' Association, hereinafter called the "Association". A resolution moved by some of the members condemning the conduct of the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the High Court in the constitution of a Full Bench which passed an interim order in a case by majority and a request to the Chief Justice to avoid repetition of such incidents was passed by the General Body of the Association on 8.10.2003. The full text of the resolution produced as Ext. P2 in the W.P. is extracted hereunder for easy reference:

"We the members of the Kerala High Court Advocates' Association express our grave concern over the manner in which a case which ordinarily ought to have been heard by a single judge having jurisdiction over the subject, was listed before the Division Bench presided by the Hon'ble Chief justice, at the request of the counsel for the petitioner without an express order stating reason for the same, and when the brother judge disagreed on the order to be passed in the case, instead of delivering separate orders and referring the matter to another judge for opinion, on the same


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top