SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 650

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR, J.M.JAMES
Shaji – Appellant
Versus
Kerala State – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.A.AbduI Gafoor, J.

In all these cases, the applicants the accused in Crime Nos. 164,182 and 214 of 2003 of Mattanchery Police Station or Thoppumpady Police Station, as the case may be, registered under S.22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') had been found possessing 'Tidigesic', a preparation of Buprenorphine, in excess of the commercial quantity made mention of against item No.169 in S.O.1055 (E) dated 19th October 2001 issued by the Union of India, as empowered under S.2(vii a) and (xxiii a). One among the applicants was found to be in possession of 64 ampules of the said substance; another one possessing 120 ampules and the remaining one possessing 15 ampules. The learned Sessions Judge, Ernakulam, as no Special Court is constituted under the Act for the said area, considered their applications and declined to grant bail. Thereupon, bail applications have been filed before this Court. When the applications came up for consideration before a learned Single Judge, the matter has been referred for consideration of the following points by a Bench: -

(1) Whether the offences which are punishable with imp


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top