SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 645

K.THANKAPPAN, B.KOSHY
Joseph Thaikoodan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Koshy, J.

In the writ appeal and the original petition the appellant and the petitioner challenge Clause 4(a) of the Mahatma Gandhi University Ordinances. The questions involved are two. They are as follows:

i) Whether the Government can interfere with the right of the educational agencies to appoint and make promotions to teaching posts and constitute screening/selection committee with Govt. Secretary and the Director of Collegiate Education?

ii) Whether the University can make Ordinances against the provisions of the University Act and incorporate a new provision for the selection and appointment of the Head of the Department?

It is stated that in view of the subsequent Government Order no decision is required on the first issue. The only question now to be decided is regarding the correctness of Clause 4(a) of Ordinance in so far as it prescribes that the post of Head of the Department can be filled up only on the basis of seniority alone.

2. It is not disputed that Ordinances are made by the University on the basis of the powers given by the Act. Section 59 of the Mahatma Gandhi University Act deals with appointment of teachers in private Colleges. Section 59 (1), (2) an





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top