SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 607

Judges : KURIAN JOSEPH
Kochaniyan - Appellant
Versus
Cochin Port Trust - Respondent
Case No : O.P. No. 16489 of 1996
Decided On : 10/22/2003
Advocates Appeared :
T.L. Ananthasivan; For Petitioner. Antony Dominic; Priya Manjooran; For Respondents.

Headnote:

Cochin Port Employees (Recruitment Seniority and Promotions) Amendment Regulations 1995 –Whether the petitioner who retired from the service of the first respondent in June, 1994 is entitled to the benefit of amendment to the Cochin Port Employees (Recruitment, Seniority and Promotions) Regulations, 1964 as amended in 1995 as per notification is the short question that arises for consideration in this Original Petition. Ext.P2 is the amendment notified Amendment provides that benefit of R.30(1) of the C.C.S. (Pension) Rules, 1972 will be applicable to the scheduled employees –Held, Ordinarily, the court should have left the matter at that since the petitioner has filed a representation before the Government of India, the second respondent as per Ext.P7 and Ext.P8 communication that the said representation was considered by the Government of India and the request was turned down no counter affidavit in the case by the Government –liberalised pension scheme vague, unenforceable or unworkable; nor that would amount to legislation by the court –Original Petition is disposed.

Judgment :-

1. Whether the petitioner who retired from the service of the first respondent in June, 1994 is entitled to the benefit of amendment to the Cochin Port Employees (Recruitment, Seniority and Promotions)

Regulations, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Regulations') as amended in 1995 as per notification dated 15.3.1995 is the short question that arises for consideration in this Original Petition. Ext.P2 is the amendment notified on 15.3.1995. The amendment provides that benefit of R.30(1) of the C.C.S. (Pension) Rules, 1972 will be applicable to the scheduled employees. There is no dispute that the petitioner was a scheduled employee as per the Regulations. R.30 of the C.C.S. (Pension) Rules reads as follows:

"30. Addition to qualifying service in special circumstances

(1) (A Government servant who retires from a service or post after the 31st March, 1960, shall be eligible to add to his service qualifying for superannuation pension (but not for any other class of pension) the actual period not exceeding one-fourth of the length of his service or the actual period by which his age at the time of recruitment exceeded twenty-five years or a period of five years, whichever is less, if the service or post to which the Government servant is appointed is one -

(a) for which post-graduate research, or specialist qualification or experience in scientific, technological or professional fields is essential; and

(b) to which candidates of more than twenty-five years of age are normally recruited.

Provided that this concession shall not be admissible to a Government servant unless his actual qualifying service at the time he quit Government service is not less than ten years.

Provided further that this concession shall be admissible only if the recruitment rules in respect of the said service or post contain a specific provision that the service or post is one which carries the benefits of this rule.

Provided also that this concession shall not be admissible to those who are eligible for counting their past service for superannuation pension unless they opt before the date of their retirement, which option once exercised shall be final, for the weightage of service under this sub-rule forgoing the counting of the past service.

(2) A Government servant who is recruited at the age of thirty-five years or more, may within a period of three months from the date of his appointment, elect to forgo his right to pension whereupon he shall be eligible to subscribe to a Contributory Provident Fund.

(3) The option referred to in sub-r.(2) once exercised, shall be final."

2. It may be seen from the first proviso that the concession is admissible only if the recruitment rules in respect of the said service or post contains provision in that regard. As far as the first respondent Port Trust is concerned, a resolution was taken on 29.9.1993. To the extent relevant, the resolution reads as follows:

"After detailed discussions, Board resolved to approve the proposal to grant the benefit of added years of service not exceeding one fourth of the length of service or the actual period by which the age at the time of recruitment exceeded 25 years or a period of 5 years, whichever is less for the purpose of superannuation pension in terms of R.30(1) of C.C.S. (Pension) Rules, 1972 as amended from time to time to the incumbent of the following posts and to incorporate a note as under to this effect in the relevant Recruitment Rules appended as SCHEDULE "A" to the Cochin Port Employees (Recruitment, Seniority and Promotion) Regulations, 1964.

1. Pilot

2. Dredger Commander

3. Engineer-in-Charge, Hopper Barges/Dredgers/Tugs.

NOTE: Those Officers appointed to the post and continue to hold the same, and those officers appointed initially to the post and subsequently promoted to higher posts, will be eligible for added years of service qualifying for superannuation pension in terms of R.30(1) of the C.C.S. (Pension) Rules, 1972, as amended from time to time."

3. S.124 of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top