SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 613

R.BASANT
Radha – Appellant
Versus
Raju – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Whether the order of the learned Magistrate discharging the respondents/ accused invoking the power under S.245 Cr.P.C. is correct? This is the short question arising for consideration in this revision.

2. The complainant's husband is facing indictment in a prosecution under S.302 I.P.C. The gist of the allegations against him in the said case is that he, along with others, trespassed into the residential building of a neighbour and caused the death of one Sabu. The complainant is the daughter of the uncle of the deceased. She had married out of her caste. The accused are all relatives of the deceased. The first accused is his brother, the second accused his mother, the third accused his brother-in-law and the 4th accused his sister. The incident in which Sabu met with his death occurred on the night of 11.7.1997. That incident was at about 10 p.m., according to the prosecution. The complainant's husband was taken into custody on the same night.

3. More than two months after the said incident, in which Sabu met with his death, the complainant filed a complaint before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Palai. In the complaint she alleged that on that night at ab




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top