SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 615

K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
Shaji – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioners are private hospitals. Some of them are run in municipal areas whereas some others are located in Panchayats. They are aggrieved by the prospects of levy of fees by the concerned Municipalities and Panchayats under the provisions of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994 and the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. The grievance of the hospitals working in the municipal area may be summarised as follows:

2. Under S.313 of the Municipality Act, every private hospital has to get registration after paying the prescribed fee. S.314A authorises the Municipality to levy fees for any services rendered to those hospitals by the Municipality. The petitioners do not have any grievance regarding the registration fee or the fee levied by them for rendering some special services to them. But they feel aggrieved by the payment of licence fee under S.447. S.447(1) reads as follows:

"A Municipality may notify by publication in the Gazette or in any other manner as may be prescribed that no place within the municipal area shall be used for any one or more of the purposes specified in the Sixth Schedule or for any other trade without a licence and except in accordance with the c




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top