SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 280

JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA, CYRIAC JOSEPH, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Malathi C. Salian – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The question that has come up for consideration before us is whether a claim under S.163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short'the Act') for compensation for death or permanent disablement be met by the Insurance Company on establishing that the death or permanent disablement was caused due to any wrongful act, neglect or default of the person in respect of whose death or permanent disablement claim has been made.

2. These cases have been placed before us on a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court after having felt that an authoritative pronouncement on the scope and ambit of S.163A is necessary. In all these cases applications were made by the legal heirs of the deceased claiming compensation under S.163A of the Act. Tribunal awarded compensation relying upon the structured formula prescribed in Schedule II. Contention raised by the Insurance Company that S.163A of the Act did not create any new right or liability and the claim could be defeated by the Insurance Company by adducing evidence was rejected by the Tribunal holding that the liability is absolute. Tribunal also found that the Insurance Company had not adduced any evidence to prove that ther






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top