The State/first respondent in the O.P. seeks review of my judgment dated 13th February, 2003 since clarified by me by order dated 5.3.2003 in C.M.P.13097/03. Under judgment dated 13th February 2003, I had afforded an opportunity to the revision petitioner, who is claimant in a land acquisition reference case to examine a witness competent to speak about a particular document which was sought to be relied on by the second respondent-Kerala Water Authority, the requisitioning authority on certain conditions. The opportunity given under judgment dated 13.2.2003 was to examine one of the parties to the particular document. Later, under the order of clarification, the expression one of the parties to the particular document was corrected as either the son of the executant of the document who is the attestor of the document or any other person who is closely acquainted with the execution of the document.

2. Review is sought essentially in respect of the correction or clarification made by me under order dated 5.3.2003 in C.M.P.13097/03.

3. Heard the Government Pleader Smt.M.Lalitha Nair for the review petitioner and Sri.Gopalakrishna Kurup, learned counsel for the first respon