SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 448

K.K.DENESAN, S.SANKARASUBBAN
Mohandas – Appellant
Versus
The Enquiry Commissioner & Special Judge – Respondent


Judgment :-

Sankarasubban, J.

These Original Petitions are filed by the members of the ersthwhile Managing Committee of the Guruvayur Devaswom and the Commissioner and the previous Administrator of the Devaswom against the orders passed by the Enquiry Commissioner and special Judge, Trichur in C.M.P.No.559 of 2002. By this order, the court has directed vigilance enquiry and further action on Ext.P1 complaint. Ext.P1 complaint is filed by one Suresh alleging certain allegations against previous members of the Managing Committee and against the Administrator and Commissioner. As soon as the complaint was received, the Special Judge called for the remarks from the Commissioner and thereafter the impugned order was passed.

2. The complaint is filed under the prevention of Corruption Act. It further states that the audit was not taking place due to the mismanagement of the members of the Managing Committee. The Enquiry Commissioner got details from the Commissioner of Guruvayur Devaswom and passed the impugned order, which is marked as Ext.P2 in O.P.No.4292 of 2003.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner mainly argued that under the Guruvayur Devaswom Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ac






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top