P.R.RAMAN
Gopidas – Appellant
Versus
Shibu Mathew – Respondent
1. The petitioner in both the Writ Petition and the Review Petition is the same. The petitioner was granted a licence for conducting toddy shop No. 13 in Changanacherry Excise Range for the period 2002-03. He availed a loan from the 4th respondent. According to him, he also gave some signed blank papers and signed blank cheque leaves towards security of the same. There is some dispute regarding the transaction between the petitioner and the 4th respondent which is not a matter to be resolved in this Writ Petition. However according to the petitioner, the employees of the petitioner's shop belonging to C.I.T.U. Union are also having some allegiance to the 4th respondent and the employees did not permit the petitioner to enter the shop at a time when the original licence granted for the year 2002-03 was in force. According to him, the licence was taken over by them and understood that it is entrusted with the 4th respondent. Ext. P2 is a petition dated 21.3.2003 filed by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent requesting him to close the toddy shop with immediate effect till 1.4.2003. The petitioner has also submitted a petition before the Sub Inspector of Police, Chinga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.