SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 488

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Nedungadi Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ezhimala Agrl. Products – Respondent


Judgment :-

Pius C. Kuriakose, J.

The Nedungadi Bank Ltd. (Original decree-holder) and the Punjab National Bank, its successor by amalgamation (the present decree-holder) are the appellants. The appeal is directed against an order passed by the executing court dismissing an application filed by the original decree-holder for cancellation of sale on grounds of fraud and material irregularity.

2. Heard Sri. K.P. Balasubramanian, counsel for the appellants and Sri. C.M. Andrews, counsel for the 15th respondent as well as Sri.M.P.Ashok Kumar, counsel for the 13th and 14th respondents, Perused the lower court records.

3. The decree was one for sale for immovable properties based on a mortgage in favour of the original decree-holder. A-schedule to the decree had four items of immovable properties out of which item No.4 was situated outside the local limits of the Payyannur Sub Court wherein the execution proceedings were initiated. As on the date of the execution petition, i.e., 27.8.1991, the amount due under the decree was Rs.6,66,237.70. Execution was sought by sale of the properties, item Nos.1 to 3 in A-Schedule to the decree. The original decree-holder suggested upset prive of Rs.60,
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top