SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 469

JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA, A.K.BASHEER
Balan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Jawarhar Lal Gupta, C.J. (Oral)

Is an applicant seeking bail bound to approach the Court of Sessions before he can move the High Court? Should the High Court refuse to entertain a petition under Section 438 or 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code directly unless 'eceptional circumstances' are shown? This is the core of the controversy in this case. The sequence of events leading to this 'reference' to the Division Bench may be briefly noticed.

2.A petition for the grant of anticipatory bail viz. Cr.M.C.No. 3265/2003 was filed by Usman. The applicant apprehended arrest in a case registerd under Sections 498A and 306 I.P.C. Similarly, there was another application viz. Crl.M.C. No.3391/2003. This had been filed under Section 439. The applicant had been arrested on the allegation that he was guilty of the offence punishable under section 55(a) of the Kerala Abkari Act. Both the applications were decided by a learned Single Judge of this Court vide order dated May 3, 2003. On a consideration of the matter, the learned judge had taken the view that "in respect of bail applications, 'frog leaping' cannot be permitted." While it was acknowledged that this Court had the "jurisdicti


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top