SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 515

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
Kunjappan – Appellant
Versus
Rajan – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. These three Civil Revision Petitions arise from a common order passed by the District Judge disposing of C.M.A. Nos.24, 32 and 36 of 2002, which in turn arose from three different Election Petitions numbered as O.P. (Election) Nos.12 of 2000, 8 of 2000 and 15 of 2000. Since the challenge in all the three Election Petitions is one and the same, that is to say, the validity of the election of the first respondent in all the three Civil Revision Petitions, who is the returned candidate, the learned District Judge heard and disposed of these three Civil Miscellaneous Appeals together. So, the Civil Revision Petitions are also heard together and disposed by a common order.

2. The first respondent was the returned candidate of the Constituency No.VII of Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayat for the election to the local bodies held on 27th September, 2000. He was declared elected. The revision petitioner in C.R.P.1613 of 2002 who is an elector of that Ward filed O.P. (Election) No.12 of 2000 for a declaration that the election of the first respondent to Ward No.VII of Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayat is void. The revision petitioner in C.R.P. No.1765 of 2002 who is another elector f






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top