SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 674

KURIAN JOSEPH, JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA
T. V. Nandanan – Appellant
Versus
Jyothish Kumar T. V. – Respondent


Judgment :-

Jawahar Lal Gupta, C.J.

Can the period of training, which does not count for probation or grant of increment, be treated as qualifying service for the purpose of promotion of a Technical Assistant to the post of Assistant Geologist? The Learned single Judge has answered this question in the affirmative and allowed the Writ Petition filed by the first respondent. Aggrieved by the order, respondent Nos. 5 and 7 in the writ petition have filed these two appeals. The facts may be briefly noticed.

2. The first respondent was selected for appointment as a Technical Assistant by the Public Service Commission. On August, 8, 1991 he was advised by the Commission to join as a Technical Assistant in the Office of the Director, Mining and Geology. He had reported for duty on September 23, 1991. However, he had to undergo training for a period of six months. On completion, the probation had commenced on March 23, 1992. It was declared that he had completed the period of probation satisfactorily on May 25, 1994.

3. In the year 1995, vacancies in the cadre of Assistant Geologist became available. Three years of service as a Technical Assistant was an essential qualification for promotion






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top