SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 131

PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Faizal – Appellant
Versus
Ussainar Kunhi – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The revision petitioner is the returned candidate in an election to the Padna Grama Panchayat of Kasaragod district. The election petition was filed as O.P. 30 of 2000 before the Munsiff's Court, Hosdurg by the first respondent arraying the returned candidate/revision petitioner and three others as respondents. Since it was found by the Returning Officer that the number of valid votes polled in favour of the revision petitioner and the first respondent were equal, a declaration regarding election was made by draw of the lot.

2. The election was sought to be set aside on various grounds including irregularities in the procedure adopted by the Returning Officer for the draw; that there has been no proper verification of valid and invalid votes; that the counting and recounting process has been irregular; that the valid votes polled in favour of the first respondent have been rejected; that the revision petitioner is guilty of corrupt practices

etc.

3. Upon entering appearance in response to the notice issued by the Court, the revision petitioner filed preliminary objections contending that the Original Petition itself is not legally maintainable and sought for its summary







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top