SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 130

C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Girijan – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Births and Deaths – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. The petitioners are parents of a child whose name is registered in the birth registry of the Calicut Corporation as "Bhagyalakshmi'. According to the petitioners, the name of the child is 'Bhagyasree' and the petitioners are entitled to change the name as sought for. The application submitted by the petitioners is seen rejected on the ground that there is no provision for change of name in the birth register. I do not think, this proposition is correct. The child is born only on 2.3.1999 and it has not reached the age to go to school to have the name entered in the school record. If the parents want to change the name of the child, they are free to do the same. So long as the second respondent is satisfied that the petitioners are the parents of the child whose birth is registered under Ext.P1, he is bound to make correction of name in the birth register maintained by the Corporation. The Original Petition is disposed of vacating Ext.P5 order and directing the first respondent to change the name of the petitioners' child from'Bhagyalakshmi' to 'Bhagyasree' in the birth register and issue a birth certificate in the changed name.

Original Petition is disposed of as abov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top