PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Rosily – Appellant
Versus
Annam – Respondent
1. The defendants in a suit for recovery of possession under S. 6 of the Specific Relief Act are aggrieved by the positive decree which is passed against them in respect of the suit schedule property-land having an extent of 3.540 cents in Survey NoS.228/3 and 228/5 of Kaduppassery Village.
2. I will refer to the parties as they were before the trial court. According to the plaintiffs, 'B' schedule property is part of 'A' schedule property having a total extent of 2 acres and 12.540 cents. 'A' schedule is described as comprised of 2.09 acres in Survey Nos. 214 and 3.280 cents in Survey No. 228/5 and 0.260 cents in Survey No.228/3. 'A' schedule property is also described as property covered by Will No.71/89 executed by Vareed and described in the commission report in O.S.715/97, a previous suit between the parties. According to the plaintiffs, 'A' schedule property stood separated from the defendants' property on its south by well-defined boundaries and the first plaintiff's father had maintained a retaining wall with jungle stones on its southern boundary. According to the plaintiffs, a portion of this retaining wall was destroyed by the defendants and O.S. 715/97 was in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.