SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Ker) 337

A.K.BASHEER, JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA
Cyril Britto – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Judgment :-

Jawahar Lal Gupta, C.J.

Is Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure which protects women from arrest or detention in execution of a money decree ultra-vires Articles 14 and 15? This is the short question that arises for consideration in this appeal. The learned Single Judge having answered this question in the negative, the writ petitioner has filed the present appeal. The facts, as relevant for the decision of this case may be briefly noticed.

2. The appellant is a Government contractor. On March 24, 1995, he filed a civil suit for the recovery of Rs.63,250/-. On November 10, 1998, the Subordinate Judge passed an ex-parte decree for the amount of Rs.63,250/- with the interest at the rate of 18%. The appellant alleged that the judgment-debtor was staying in Chennai and that she does not hold any property. Thus, it was difficult for him to execute the decree. He further alleged that it would be impossible to “have a personal execution” by virtue of Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Thus, he filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the prayer that Section 56 be declared as unconstitutional.

3. The matter was considered by the learned S











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top