SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 35

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, M.N.KRISHNAN
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Rajmohan – Respondent


Judgment :-

Radhakrishnan, J.

Whether the Debt Recovery Tribunal has got the jurisdiction to determine the preferential claim of the Government of Kerala over the properties mortgaged to the Banking Institutions is the question that has come up for consideration in this case.

2. State Government and the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes have approached this court seeking writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings initiated by the Recovery Officer of the debt Recovery Tribunal for sale of the various properties belonging to respondents 1 to 5. On enquiry made by the second petitioner it was noticed that some of the properties of respondents 1 to 5 were attached on behalf of Indian Overseas Bank on the basis of the proceedings initiated by the Debt Recovery Tribunal Ernakulam. State maintains the stand that it has got first charge over the various properties brought to sale by the recovery Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal. An amount of Rs.9,73,64,415/- is due from the first respondent towards sales tax arrears for the years 1972-73 to 1995-96. Second petitioner had already issued assessment orders after issuing assessment notice to all the parties and after obtaining rep










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top