SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 141

J.B.KOSHY, K.P.BALACHANDRAN
C. K. Prasannan – Appellant
Versus
T. P. Haris – Respondent


Judgment :-

Koshy, J.

Can a legatee under the will claim the status of a tenant if he is also one of the legal heirs, can a heir of the statutory tenant claim all the benefits entitled to the statutory tenants, what are the effect of subsequent events in a rent control petition under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (for short ‘the Act’) etc. are some of the questions to be decided in this case. Before dealing with the above issues, we may, briefly, narrate the facts. R.C.P. No. 103 of 1986 was filed by the first respondent herein seeking eviction of the petition schedule building contending that no rent was paid from October, 1965, and therefore, tenant is liable to be evicted under section 11 (2) (b) of the Act. It was also contended that first respondent herein was employed in Saudi Arabia and his future in Saudi Arabia was uncertain. Since his employment would be terminated at any time, he wanted to start a garment business in the petition schedule building. He had necessary funds for starting the business and he had no other building for starting the said business. Hence, he sought eviction under section 11 (3) of the Act. The rent control petition was allowed




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top