SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 109

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
V. K. Sreenivasan – Appellant
Versus
D. G. Nair – Respondent


Judgment :-

The complainant in M.P. No. 8037 of 2004 on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam is the petitioner. This writ petition is filed challenging an order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate by which it was decided to conduct an enquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the complaint filed by the petitioner.

2. The petitioner is one of the Directors of M/s. Sujith Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and Managing Director of Kalliyara Estates (Pvt.) Ltd. and Vasco Metals and Steels Pvt. Ltd. He is also stated to be the Managing Partner of G.P. Nair Plantations. It is averred that 41.5 cents of land in Survey No.602/1 of Ernakulam Village along with a building standing thereon belongs to M/s. Sujith enterprises Pvt. Ltd. 11 rooms in this building are rented out to various persons and the remaining rooms are occupied by M/s. Sujith Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. It is averred that rooms 1 to 5 are occupied by G.P. Nair Plantations, 6 to 14 by Kalliyara Estates Pvt. Ltd., 15 to 21 by K.K. Bhuvanadas Enterprises and 22 to 29 are let out to one V.R. Balakrishnan. It is averred that V.R. Balakrishnan sublet the rooms to Vasco Metals and Steels Pvt. Ltd. with the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top