Bhaskaran, J.

This revision is at the instance of the 2nd respondent in R.C.P.No.13 of 1999 on the file of the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam. The landlord invoked most of the sub-clauses in S.11 of he Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act in the Rent Control Petition. To be specific, the petition was filed under Ss.11(2) (a), (b), 11(3), 11(4) (i), 11(4) (ii) and 114(v). The 2nd respondent alone contested the case and this revision is at his instance.

2. The case of the landlord as petitioner in the Rent Control Petition is that the petition schedule shop room was originally let out to Krishna Panicker, husband of the 1st respondent, in 1968. After the death of Krishna Panicker, the shop room was rented out to the 1st respondent on 5-1-1977 on a monthly rent of Rs.80/-. The rent was increased from time to time and the present rent is Rs.500/-. The rent upto May, 1998 was paid by the 1st respondent. The petitioner’s second son depending on his intends to start a business to himself. There is no other suitable shop room in his possession. Therefore the petition schedule shop room is needed bona fide for running a business by the petitioner. He sent a notice demandin