SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 367

Judges : K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR,K.HEMA
The Kerala Public Service Commission, Rep by its Secretary - Appellant
Versus
P.K.Ramesan - Respondent
Case No : W.A.Nos.1381, 1374 1483 and 1484 of 2003, 1180 of 2004 & O.P.Nos.13511, 13948, 14317 and 14333 of 2000 & 23761 & 33705 of 2001
Decided On : 06/22/2005
Advocates Appeared :
For the Appellants: P.C. Sasidharan, SC, KPSC. For the Respondents: R1 to R13, P.P. Jacob, R15, P.V. Surendranath, Bindumol Joseph, R16, R17, N. Sugathan, K.R.B. Kaimal, C. Raman, Government Pleader, A.V. Ramakrishna Panicker, R. Seema, Advocates.

Headnote:

Kerala Co operative Societies Rules 1969 - Rule 186 -Appointment - Qualification of Clerks - Findings of - Held, question of promotion to a post which even carried at the relevant point of time and at the initial introduction of the R.186, a pay above Rs.250 also does not have any relevance in the light of the categoric finding in the said judgment - So the relevant criterion for the purpose of R.186 shall be the pay attached to the pay scale as on the date of promotion or direct recruitment as the case may be - Court is of view that appeals have to succeed and the impugned judgments have to be set aside resulting in dismissal of the writ petitions - Appeal Allowed

Judgment :-

Abdul Gafoor, J.

All these Writ Appeals, except W.A.No.1180 of 2004, which will be dealt with separately, have been filed by the Kerala Public Service Commission. In the impugned Judgment, it is directed:

“……………to take all steps so as to see that the applications of the petitioners in these Original Petitioners are treated as valid for all purposes. What is necessarily to be done by the public service Commission are to be expeditiously carried out. Depending upon the ultimate rank they secure, as adjudged, they have to be accommodated in the rank list which is already published.â€

This direction was issued after having found that “the petitioners have a strong base when they urge that notwithstanding the reference to the pay scales in the notification, it has in fact an invitation to a post which carried basic pay of less than Rs.250/- (in this case Rs.140/-) in contradistinction to posts which had pay scale of Rs.250/- and above.†The short facts necessary for disposal of these Writ Appeals are as follows:

2. The Act, namely, Kerala Public Service Commission (Additional Functions as Respects certain Societies) Act, 1996 was enforced with effect from 27.10.1995. Going by this Act, by Section 80(3A) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and by Rule 187 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) direct recruitment to the post of Clerk/Cashier in the District Co-operative Banks has to be made by the Public Service Commission. Fifty per cent of the vacancies shall have to be filled up through direct recruitment from among the members of the staff of the Primary Co-operative Societies possessing required qualification. Accordingly, the Public Service Commission, on getting requisition form the concerned District Co-operative Banks, issued Ext.P1 notification on 26.10.1999. These cases are confined only to the vacancies reserved exclusively for “eligible employees of Primary Co-operative Societies.â€

3. Ext.P1 notification was issued inviting application from those who possess B.A./B.Sc./B.Com. with H.D.C. or J.D.C. or B.Com. with Co-operation or B.Sc. (Co-operation and Banking) of the Kerala Agricultural University, with three years regular service in the Primary Co-operative Society as experience. The writ petitioners, though they did not possess graduation, applied pursuant to Ext.P1 notification. Their applications were rejected. They approached this Court contending that insistence by the Public Service Commission for minimum qualification of graduation is opposed to Rule 186(ii) read with Appendix-III to the Rules, which provides that in relation to the posts carrying scale of pay of less than Rs.250 per month, the qualification shall only be matriculation or S.S.L.C. and not graduation. Therefore, insistence of graduation by the Public Service Commission in Ext.P1 was bad in view of the statutory rules. This over insistence defeats the rights of the writ petitioners for being considered for appointment. In support of this contentions, the writ petitioners mainly relied on Appendix III referred to in Rule 182(1) of the Rule. It is submitted that for all posts which is having a pay of less than Rs.250/-, S.S.L.C. with J.D.C. shall be the minimum qualification for appointment.

4. The scale of pay of the post of Clerk/Cashier notified in Ext.P1 at the relevant time was Rs.1665-3955, meaning thereby, the pay was above Rs.250/-. This is an admitted position going by Ext.P1 itself.

5. It is contended, based on letter No.E(M)(1)1.1062/82 dated 15.6.1982 issued by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Trivandrum that pending amendment to the Rules “the qualification under Rule 186 of K.C.S. Rules for different categories of posts have to be decided based on the pre-revised scales of pay which is prescribed in Appendix III to the K.C.S. Rules, 1969â€. In other words, whatever revision that had taken place subsequent to the initial introduction of Appendix II
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top