SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 304

R.BHASKARAN, K.R.UDAYABHANU
Arumugham – Appellant
Versus
R. Leena – Respondent


Judgment :-

Bhaskaran, J.

This Rent Control Revision is filed by the respondent in R.C.P.No.119/1994 on the file of the Rent Control Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The Rent Control Court as well as the Rent Control Appellate Authority have allowed the claim of the landlord.

2. According to the landlord, the original tenant was the wife of the respondent in the R.C.P. and after her death, the present tenant executed a fresh rent deed on 4-12-1991 agreeing to pay monthly rent of Rs.350. Originally the landlord’s father was conducting bakery business in the entire building. When he became old and was unable to make bakery items he decided to continue the business by purchasing bakery items from outside and to do business in a portion of the building and the remaining portion was let out to the respondent’s wife. For that purpose a temporary partition was made of the room where the bakery business was conducted. After the death of the father, the petitioner continued the business. The husband of the petitioner is not having any source of income. Both the landlord and her husband are now engaged in the bakery business. They want to expand the business and for that purpose the petition schedul










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top