RAJEEV GUPTA, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Mr. Sahir Shah – Appellant
Versus
Bank of India – Respondent
Radhakrishnan, J.
Whether permission of the Debt Recovery Tribunal is a pre requisite for a Bank or Fianancial Institution to invoke the provisions of Section 13 B of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short “Securitisation Actâ€) after the insertion of the proviso to section 19 of the Enforcement of Security Interests and Recovery of Debts Laws Amendment Act, 2004, is the question that has come up for consideration is this case.
2. Bank of India, respondent herein, filed O.A.No.318 of 2001 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal on 23.11.2001 for realization of an amount of Rs.4,81,92,595.74 from the writ petitioners and others jointly, severally and personally together with interest at 18% per annum with quarterly rests from 23.11.2001 till date of payment and also for costs of the proceeding. While the O.A. was pending, the Bank invoked the provisions of Section 13 (2) of the Securitisation Act vide notice dated 23.1.2004 informing them that an amount of Rs.6,33,65,539/- is outstanding and that the said amount is secured by equitable mortgage of 225 cents of landed property in survey numbers 2073/1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.