SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 462

K.THANKAPPAN
J. Daniel – Appellant
Versus
The State of Kerala Represented by the Director General Of Prosecution – Respondent


Judgment :-

This is a petition to grant leave to file an appeal against the judgment in C.C.No.259/2004 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Nedumangad. The above case was on a complaint filed by the petitioner alleging that the 2nd respondent committed an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’. It is stated in the complaint that the 2nd respondent issued Ext.P1 cheque in favour of the petitioner in discharge of an amount of Rs.60,000/- alleged to have been owed by him and on presentation of the same, it was dishonoured stating “Funds insufficient”. The petitioner caused a statutory notice to the 2nd respondent demanding the amount covered by the cheque. Though the 2nd respondent received the notice, the amount was not paid. Hence the complaint was filed. The trial court took cognizance of the offence and tried the case. Before the trial court P.Ws.1 to 4 were examined on the side of the prosecution and marked Exts.P1 to P9. On the side of the defence 2nd respondent himself was examined as DW1 and Exts. D1 to D5 were marked. After considering the evidence, the trial court acqui



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top