Judges : PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
S.Sisupalan - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala Rep by its Secretary to Government - Respondent
Case No : W.P.(C) Nos. 19458 of 2005 (N) & 18529 of 2005 (E)
Decided On : 07/15/2005
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioners : V.P. Seemandini, M.S. Unnikrishnan, Veena B. Kumar, Lekshmy Ramanathan, Advocates. For the Respondents: L. Aloysius Thomas, Govt. Pleader.
Land Acquisition - Proceedings challenged for acquisition of land for conversion of Kollam-Punalur meter-gauge railway line as broad-gauge - Sections 4(1), 9(3), 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act - Declaration under Section 6, Possession of Property, Emergency Provisions - Summary: The court discussed the necessity of a declaration under Section 6 for acquisition of land, the legality of taking possession in the absence of such declaration, and the applicability of emergency provisions under Section 17(1). The court held that possession cannot be taken prior to the promulgation of a declaration under Section 6 and that the attempt to dispossess the petitioners without such declaration is illegal. The court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners until a declaration under Section 6 is made and published, keeping further proceedings in abeyance.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners challenge land acquisition proceedings for the conversion of a railway line. They received notices under Section 9(3) of the Land Acquisition Act and apprehend immediate dispossession under emergency powers of Section 17(4) without a declaration under Section 6.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that possession cannot be taken prior to the promulgation of a declaration under Section 6 and that the attempt to dispossess the petitioners without such declaration is illegal. The court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners until a declaration under Section 6 is made and published, keeping further proceedings in abeyance.
Issues: Legality of taking possession without a declaration under Section 6, Applicability of emergency provisions under Section 17(1)
Ratio Decidendi: A declaration under Section 6 is indispensable for land acquisition. Possession cannot be taken prior to the promulgation of a declaration under Section 6. Emergency provisions under Section 17(1) do not enable the Government to defer the promulgation of the declaration under Section 6 to a day after possession is taken.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners until a declaration under Section 6 is made and published, keeping further proceedings in abeyance.
Petitioners in both these cases challenge the proceedings initiated for acquisition of land for the purposes of conversion of Kollam-Punalur meter-gauge railway line as broad-gauge. Petitioners in both the cases concede that notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act has been promulgated as per Ext.P1. The Petitioners have now received notices under Section 9(3) of the Act which are produced as Ext.P2 in these cases. The petitioners apprehend that in exercise of the emergency powers under Section 17(4) of the Act, they are going to be dispossessed of their properties immediately. According to them, in theses cases, the declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act has not been made and they are not liable to be dispossessed till such time as declaration under Section 6 is promulgated.
2. When these Writ Petitions came up for admission, I granted stay of dispossession temporarily and directed the Government Pleader to get instructions from the respondents as to whether declaration under Section 6 has been promulgated, On being informed that Section 6 declaration is yet to be promulgated, I have heard the submissions of Sri. M.S. Unnikrishnan representing M/s. Sukumaran and Usha on behalf of the petitioners and Sri. L. Aloysius Thomas, learned Government Pleader on behalf of the 1st respondent-state and the other two respondents. Arguments of the counsel were confined to the question as to whether in the absence of a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, the land-owners are liable to be dispossessed in exercise of the powers under Section 17(1) or Section 17(2) of the Act.
3. According to Mr. Unnikrishnan, the issue as to whether the land in question is needed for a public purpose will attain finality only when the declaration under Section 6 is promulgated and only such a declaration will be exclusive evidence regarding the public nature of the need. Inviting my attention to Sections 4 and 6 of the Act, Mr. Unnikrishnan submitted that even in cases where the emergency provisions under Section 17 are invoked, a declaration under Section 6 is obligatory. He relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in R.L. Jain v. DDA (2004)4 SCC 79) to support his arguments.
4. Sri. L. Aloysius Thomas, learned Government Pleader on the contrary submitted that this is a case where the emergency provisions under Section 17 have been invoked by the Government and therefore it is open to the Government to make the declaration under Section 6 at any time after the notification under Section 4(1). This, according to the learned Government Pleader, is clear from the language of Section 17(4) itself. He would cite the judgment of this court in Abdulla Kutty Haji v. State (1960 KLT 1029) as well as that of the Supreme Court in State of U.P. v. Pista Devi (AIR 1986 SC 2025) so as to fortify his submissions.
5. I have considered the rival submissions, the pleadings in the petitions, the relevant statutory provisions as well as the decisions cited at the Bar.
6. The notification envisaged under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act is a preliminary notification. Such notifications are promulgated by the Government when it appears to the Government that a particular land is needed for a public purpose or is lightly to be needed for a public purpose. If the acquisition is not a case of urgency, then the land Acquisition Officer holds an enquiry under Section 5-A on the basis of the objections received by him to the notification under Section 4(1) and hears the parties. Thereafter, the Land Acquisition Officer submits a report to the Government incorporating his recommendations regarding the objection raised by the parties to the notice under Section 4(1) as well as a record of the proceedings before him in the enquiry under Section 5A. It is the Government which takes the final decision regarding acquisition on the basis of the above report and thereafter the Government promulgates the declaration un
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.