SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 443

K.HEMA
S. Thangamani – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor – Respondent


Judgment :-

Does a son require any written authorisation from his mother to prosecute his father and second wife for bigamy under section 494 of Indian Penal Code (IPC, for short)? It is necessary that a complaint filed by the son should reflect that the complainant is filed “on behalf of’ the mother? These are the main questions which arise for consideration in this case.

2. The second respondent herein filed a private complaint before the Magistrate’s Court against the father and his second wife. The offence alleged is under section 494 and 34 of Indian Penal Code (IPC, for short). As per allegations in the complaint, complaint’s father who is arrayed as first accused married his mother in accordance with the religious rites and two children were also born in the wed-lock. But, while the marriage was subsisting, his father married the petitioner herein. The complainant came to know about the second marriage only when divorce proceedings were initiated by his father against the mother and when he made certain enquiries in connection with the same. The complainant, being aggrieved by the second marriage of his father filed the complaint.

3. Petitioner-second wife seeks to quash the p





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top