SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 441

Judges : THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Chakolas Spinning & Weaving Mills Limited - Appellant
Versus
The State of Kerala, Represented by the Secretary - Respondent
Case No : WP(C).Nos.31706 of 2004 (Y)
Decided On : 07/20/2005
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioners: Antony Dominic, E.K. Nandakukar, A.K. Jayasankar Nambiar, Anil D. Nair, Priya Mahesh, E.P. Govindan, A. Kumar, Renjith Thampan, Premjit Nagendran, John Ramesh K.I. John, B.S. Krishnan (SR)., K. Anand, Latha Krishnan, N. Muraleedharan Nair, V.K. Shamsudheen, Manoj Kumar. M., C.K. Thanju Pillai, T.K. Shaji Raj, Advocates. For the Respondents: Raju Joseph, SPL. Govt. Pleader.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity of Section 76 of the Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 and the interpretation of the notification to limit the application of the fee to specific appeals/revisions.

Headnote:

Court-fees - Constitutional Validity of Section 76 of Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 - Section 76 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 76 of the Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 (Kerala Act X of 1960) is challenged for imposing additional court-fees on appeals or revisions to tribunals or appellate authorities. The court discusses legislative competence, imposition of tax or fee, rule of laying, impact of Section 2(2) of the CF Act, and impairment of vested right of appeal. The court upholds the validity of Section 76, interprets the notification, and limits the application of the fee to appeals/revisions arising from assessment orders issued after the notification was issued.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petitions challenge the constitutional validity of Section 76 of the Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 and the notification issued by the Government of Kerala authorizing levy of additional court-fee. The petitioners are assesses under the Commercial Tax Laws and have statutory remedies by way of appeal to the Appellate Authorities or the Tribunals. The impugned statutory provision, notification, and circular of the chairman of the Appellate Tribunal are challenged in the writ petitions.

Finding of the Court:

The court upholds the validity of Section 76 of the CF Act and the notification. It interprets the notification to limit the application of the fee to appeals/revisions arising from assessment orders issued after the notification was issued. The court also directs the mode of collection to ensure that the amounts collected are credited to the Legal Benefit Fund.

Issues: The issues include legislative competence to make law as provided by Section 76 of the CF Act, whether Section 76 is an imposition of a tax or fee, rule of laying, impact of Section 2(2) of the CF Act, and impairment of vested right of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determines that Section 76 of the CF Act is valid and interprets the notification to limit the application of the fee. It also rules that the mode of collection should ensure that the amounts collected are credited to the Legal Benefit Fund.

Final Decision: The court disposes of the writ petitions with declarations and directions, upholding the validity of Section 76 and limiting the application of the fee to appeals/revisions arising from assessment orders issued after the notification was issued.

Judgment :-

These writ petitions are filed challenging the constitutional validity of Section 76 of the Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 (Kerala Act X of 1960), hereinafter “the CF Act”, for short, and the notification issued by the Government of Kerala as per S.R.O.No.226/2002 published in the Kerala Gazette Extra-ordinary No.420 dated 5-4-2002, by which, the government authorized levy of additional court-fee in exercise of power under sub-section (1) of Section 76 of the CF Act. After the issuance of the aforesaid Notification, the Chairman of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal issued a Circular, which is also under challenge.

2. The petitioners are assesses under the Commercial Tax Laws, to wit, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Kerala General Sales Tax Act or the Value Added Tax Act. As against assessment orders and allied mattes, they have statutory remedies by way of appeal to the Appellate Authorities or the Tribunals, as the case may be, as are constituted under the said enactments.

3. Section 76 of the Act reads as follows:

“76. Legal Benefit Fund.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force, It shall be competent for Government to levy an additional court-fee, by notification in the Gazette, in respect of appeals or revisions to tribunals or appellate authorities, other than Civil and Criminal Courts, at a rate not exceeding one per cent of the amount involved in the dispute in cases where it is capable of valuation and in other cases at a rate not exceeding one hundred rupees for each appeal or revision.

(2) There shall be constituted a legal benefit fund to which shall be credited-

(i) The proceeds of the additional court-fee levied and collected under sub-section (1);

(ii) fifty per cent of the court-fees levied and collected on mukhtarnama or vakalathnama under Article 16 of Schedule II of this Act.

(3) The fund constituted under sub-section (2) shall be applied, and utilized for the purpose of providing an efficient legal service for the people of the State and to provide social security measures for the legal profession.

(4) The mode and manner in which legal service to the people may be made more efficient and social security measures for legal profession may be provided shall be as prescribed by rules made by Government.”

4. Though the aforesaid is part of the CF Act that came into force on 1-2-1962, the Kerala Legal Benefit fund Rules, 1991 were made by the Government in exercise of power conferred by sub-section (4) of Section 76, only with effect from 23-5-1991. The Kerala Legal Benefit Fund contemplated by Section 76(2) of the CF Act was constituted and notified as per S.R.O,No.225/2002 in the Kerala Gazette Extra-ordinary No.419 dated 5-4-2002.

5. By. S.R.O.NO.226/2002 published in the Kerala Gazette Extra-ordinary No.420 dated 5-4-2002, hereinafter referred to as the “Notification”, the Government authorized levy of additional court-fee in exercise of power sub-section (1) of Section 76 of the CF Act. The said notification with Explanatory Note is as follows:

“NOTIFICATION

S.R.O.No.226/2002 (published in K.G. Exty.No.420 dated 05-04-2002) – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 76 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959, the Government of Kerala hereby authorize the levy by the Tribunals and appellate authorities constituted by or under any special or local law, other than Civil and Criminal courts of additional court fee in respect of each appeal or revision at the rate of 0.5% of the amount involved in the dispute in cases where it is capable of valuation and in other cases at the rate of Rupees fifty in each such case. The amount so collected shall be credited to the Kerala Legal Benefit Fund constituted under sub-section (2) of Section 76 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959.

Explanatory Note

(This does not form part of the notification, but is intended to indicate its general purport.)

As








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top