SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 584

M.N.KRISHNAN, M.RAMACHANDRAN
S. Shameem – Appellant
Versus
The City Police Commissioner – Respondent


Judgment :-

This is an application for police protection. The petitioner had invited our attention to Ext.15 representation submitted by him dated 31-08-2005. Although it was addressed to the Commissioner of Police, Thiruvananthapuram, he submitted that the third respondent was attempting to take law in his hands so as to evict him from the tenanted premises unlawfully, where he was conducting business, and it was imperative that the police is directed to render sufficient help so as to protect him.

2. According to the petitioner, Ext. P1 rent deed dated 01-06-2001 in respect of a shop room governed the relationship between himself and the third respondent, who was the landlord. He had been authorised to conduct a readymade dress shop and due licence had been granted by the corporation for the business. Later on arrears of rent fell due and R.C.P.No.6 of 2004 had come to be filed, which resulted in an order for eviction. Against the said order, R.C.A.NO.9 of 2005 had been filed by him and the First Additional district Judge, Thiruvananthapuram in I.A.No.384 of 2005 in R.C.A.No.9 of 2005 had stayed the order of eviction. It was not attempted to be vacated and the submission was that
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top