SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 650

Judges : K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
Thomas P.C.@ Fr.Thomas Pudussery - Appellant
Versus
Bar Council Of Kerala - Respondent
Case No : WP.(C) Nos.18312, 20635 & 20636 of 2005 (F)
Decided On : 11/07/2005
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner: Wilson Urmese, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Grashious Kuriakose, R2, T.A. Shaji, R3, V.V. Surendran, Advocates.

Headnote:

Bar Council of Kerala Rules 1979 - Rule 2(h) - Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 47 to 49 - Whether priests and nuns are eligible to be enrolled as Advocates, for the decision of this Court - Held, If the Bar Council of Kerala has got any doubts regarding the nature of duties of a Parish priest, the petitioner in WP may be called upon to furnish the details regarding the nature of duties as a Parish priest and the time required to discharge those duties - If those duties, are rendered as a part-time voluntary service to the parishioners and the same will not affect the functioning as a full-time lawyer, he can be allowed to be enrolled - He can be asked to quit the post of Parish priest, to enable him to get enrolled as an advocate - Impugned orders are quashed -Writ Petitions Disposed of

Judgment :-

These Writ Petitions throw up an interesting point, i.e, whether priests and nuns are eligible to be enrolled as Advocates, for the decision of this Court.

WP(C) No.20635/05

2. This Writ Petition is filed by a Roman Catholic priest, under the Diocese of Irinjalakuda. He has graduated in Law from the Bangalore University. He submitted the application for enrolment, before the Kerala Bar Council, after paying all the requisite fees. He also paid a late fee of Rs.2,000/- for participating in the enrollment, which was schedule to be held on 21.11.2004. While so, he was served with Ext.P2 communication dated 30.10.2004, calling upon him, to submit certain particulars and also to furnish an affidavit, stating that, presently, he is not holding any post or rendering any service or doing any business or profession in any society or institution. He submitted the requisite documents and also produced Ext.P3 certificate, which stated that he is working as a Parish Priest of Little Flower Church, Anandapuram, for which, no remuneration is paid to him. The petitioner was called for a hearing, by the Enrolment Committee on 10.11.2004. But, he was not permitted to participate in the enrolment held on 21.11.2004. He submits, his application is kept pending without any orders passed thereon. The petitioner contends, as per the provisions of the Advocates Act and the Rules framed thereunder, by the Bar Council of India and the Bar Council of Kerala, he is eligible to be enrolled. He also submits, by being a priest, he cannot be treated as employed in any salaried post or job. The relevant pleading of the petitioner in this regard is contained in Ground D, which reads as follows:

“It is submitted that the petitioner is a priest and that he is not engaged in any kind of salaried job or activity, which receive remuneration. It is submitted that priesthood is a religious life-style and not a profession. The Catholic church counts priesthood as one of the seven sacraments of Christianity. The marriage, blessing of life together is also considered as one of the seven sacraments. As a priest, the petitioner is doing purely spiritual service, is not a bar for doing any profession. A number of priests and nuns are already engaged in different profession like teaching, nursing etc. (and) even in government service. It is also a fact that a number of priests and nuns have already enrolled as advocates and (are) doing their practice at different places.”

Therefore, he prays for a declaration that he is eligible to be enrolled as an Advocate on the rolls of the State Bar Council. He also seeks a mandamus to admit him as an Advocate on the rolls of the State Bar Council.

3. The 1st respondent Kerala Bar Council has filed a counter affidavit. According to the Bar Council, the petitioner has entered the profession of divinity. The vocation thus chosen by the petitioner, has got all the trappings of an employment or a profession. He is employed as a Parish priest and therefore, he is not eligible to be enrolled as an Advocate, as per the relevant rules. It is also contended that nuns, priests and sanyasins belonging to different religions are members of a profession and are not expected or cannot be permitted to practice the legal profession, by allowing them to be enrolled as Advocates. If they enter the field of administration of justice, the same will run counter to the fundamental tenets of secularism. So, they are not entitled to be enrolled as Advocates, it is contended.

WP(C) No.18312/2005

4. This Writ Petition is filed by a nun, who is a Law graduate. Though, she submitted the application for enrolment as an Advocate, the same was not allowed by the Bar Council of Kerala. No order, rejecting her application for enrolment, is produced in the Writ Petition. Her prayer is, for a declaration that she is eligible to be enrolled as an Advocate and she prays for issuing a writ of mandamus to the Bar Council of Kerala, to allow her to be enrolled. She is e














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top