SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 759

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Vishnu – Respondent


Judgment :-

This is a proceedings initiated suo motu under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for canceling the pre-arrest bail granted to the respondent.

2. The facts necessary for the disposal of the case is as follows: The respondent Vishnu, S/o. Jayashree is the 2nd accused in Crime No.221 of 2004 of Pazhayannur Police Station. 1st accused in that case is one Sulaiman, S/o. Saithumohammed. The accused, it is alleged, in furtherance of a common intention of committing theft of cement stored for the construction of a building of the defacto complainant Veerankutty, committed theft of one bag of cement from the construction site and placed the same in an autorickshaw. Before they could steal another packet of cement, the defacto complainant came to the spot. On seeing the defacto complainant, the accused abandoned not only the cement bag they had stolen, but also the autorickshaw and fled away from the scene of occurrence. Based on the F.I. statement given by the defacto complainant, Crime No.221 of 2004 of Pazhayannur Police Station under Section 379 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code was registered against the respondent and Sulaiman.

3. 1st accused Sulaiman f

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top