SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 724

R.BASANT
N. Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
A. C. Thomas – Respondent


Judgment :-

Can an account maintained in the name of a firm be said to be an account maintained by its Managing Partner? Can the managing Partner who issued the cheque be said to be the drawer of the cheque? These question arise for consideration in this case.

2. This revision petition is directed against the concurrent verdict of guilty, conviction and sentence (the sentence was modified by the appellate court) imposed on the revision petitioner/accused under section 138 of the N.I.Act.

3. The cheque is for an amount of Rs.90,000/-. The cheque is issued by the accused as Managing partner of M/s. Integrated Homoeo Pharmaceuticals, a firm. The complainant alleged that the accused had borrowed an amount of Rs.90,000/- and had issued the cheque in question, Ext.P1, for the discharge of the said liability. The Cheque, when presented, was dishonored on the ground of insufficiency of funds. A notice of demand was issued. The same was not received and was returned unclaimed. It is in these circumstances that the complainant came to court with this prosecution under section 138 of the N.I. Act after scrupulously observing the statutory time table.

4. The Complainant exmined himself as PW1 an


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top