Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Reserves Verdict in Raju Tampering Conviction Plea
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
S.SANKARASUBBAN
Catholic Laymen s Association – Appellant
Versus
The Synod of Bishops of the Syro Malabar Major Archiepiscopal Church – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER
S.Sankarasubban, J.
Plaintiffs in O.S. No.184/98 on the file of the Third Addl. Sub Judge, Kozhikode are the revision petitioners. The 1st revision petitioner, an unregistered society, which got registered subsequently, as an organization of Christ's faithful belonging to and attending the numerous and several churches under the Syro Malabar Church. The other revision petitioners were the plaintiffs in the suit who are interested in the subject matter of the suit which is a public trust. The petitioners filed O.S. No.184/98 before the Sub Court, Kozhikode seeking several reliefs, inter alia, a declaration that the draft rules, Palliyogam Procedural Rules, promulgated by the 1st respondent and attempted to be implemented by the 2nd respondent and similar other Bishops of the church are ultra vires the Gospel, the Holy Bible, Catholic Church ideals and traditions and therefore unlawful and unenforceable. The petitioners also sought a prohibitory injunction restraining the respondents and similarly placed other persons from implementing the impugned rules dated 16-1-1998 and for settling scheme for wi
The Sub-Court has jurisdiction under Section 92 of the CPC for public trust matters despite a subsequent registration under the Societies Registration Act.
Jurisdictional objections in civil suits must be raised promptly, and suits undervalued must be filed in the appropriate court as per statutory provisions.
The court established that jurisdictional objections must be raised promptly, and a suit undervalued must be filed in the appropriate lower court as per the Arunachal Pradesh Civil Court Act, 2021.
A suit under Section 92 C.P.C. must be filed in the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction, not in a Civil Judge's Court, and the absence of a trust-deed does not prevent admission.
The court established that membership eligibility in a society is governed by its bye-laws, and individuals cannot claim membership rights without meeting the stipulated criteria. Additionally, the c....
The court emphasized that the burden of proof regarding the trust's classification and maintainability lies with the plaintiffs, especially under Section 29 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article