SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 396

G.SASIDHARAN
P. Raghuthaman – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

The question which arises for consideration is whether before registering a crime on the basis of a private complaint forwarded to the Vigilance Special Cell for investigation under S. 156(3), Cr. P.C. from the Court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Vigilance, is it mandatory that the Vigilance Special Cell has to conduct a preliminary enquiry.

The petitioner is the accused in a Crime registered by VACB Special Cell, Kozhikode. The above crime was registered by the Superintendent of Police, VACB, Special Cell, Kozhikode on the basis of a complaint forwarded from the Court under S. 156(3) Cr. P.C. for investigation. The private complaint was given by the second respondent in the Court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Vigilance, Kozhikode and it was from that Court, it was forwarded to the police for investigation. At the time of registering the crime, Annexure B FIR was prepared by the Superintendent of Police.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income since January, 1990 while he was working in various posts in the Public Works Department. Crime was registered alleging c







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top