SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 64

M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR
Thankamani – Appellant
Versus
Prabhakaran – Respondent


Judgment :-

M.R. Hariharan Nair, J.

Can a party to a civil suit request the court for permission to cross-examine the witness cited by himself? This is the question posed for decision in this case.

2. In answer to the suit for money in respect of an amount of Rs. 15,000/- brought by the respondent herein, the defendant (revision petitioner herein) set up a counterclaim for a sum of Rs. 25,000/-. It was alleged that the defendant's title deeds were given to the plaintiff; that he borrowed Rs. 25,000/- from one Vinod by pledging the document to him; that ultimately the defendant had to pay the sum of Rs.25,000/-to Vinod and that in the circumstances, the plaintiff was liable to pay the defendant the said amount of Rs. 25,000/-. In order to prove the contention, the defendant cited the said Vinod as a witness. Vinod, however, did not support the defence case when examined in court. A motion was subsequently made for re-opening evidence and to recall Vinod for subjecting him to cross-examination. As per the impugned order the trial court dismissed both the applications. It is aggrieved by this common order that the petitioner has approached this Court.

3. Sri. A. Mohamed Mustaque, who arg













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top