SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 95

A.LEKSHMIKUTTY, S.SANKARASUBBAN
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Antony – Respondent


Judgment :-

S. Sankarasubban, J.

These Writ Appeals arise from the judgment in O.P. No. 18569 of 1997. While W.A.No.2429 of 2000 is filed by respondents 1 and 2 in the Original Petition, the other Writ Appeal, viz., W.A.No. 2900 of 2000 is filed by the petitioner in the Original Petition. The Petitioner in the Original Petition, V. Antony was an Officer of the erstwhile Bank of Cochin. While he was working in the Bank of Cochin, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him. After a domestic enquiry, it was found that the charges against the petitioner were proved. The Disciplinary Authority imposed a punishment of dismissal.

2. The Order of dismissal was challenged before the Industrial Tribunal, Alappuzha, as though he was a workman. But the Industrial Tribunal found that he was not a workman and hence, the petitioner did not succeed there. The Order of the Industrial Tribunal was challenged before this Court in the Original Petition. This Court upheld the findings of the Industrial Tribunal that the petitioner was not a workman, but held that he was entitled to resort to other legal proceedings. In the meanwhile under the scheme of amalgamation, dated 25th August 1985, the B










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top