SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 151

G.SASIDHARAN, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Director of Panchayats Office of The Director of Panchayat, Secretariat, Trivandrum – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Krishnan – Respondent


Judgment :-

RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

The question that has come up for consideration is whether President of a Gram Panchayat has got power to take disciplinary action against a non-gazetted Government servant allotted to the Panchayat. Learned Single Judge took the view that since first respondent-petitioner was not appointed by the President of the Gram Panchayat he has no power to take disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner.

Short facts which are necessary for the disposal of the case are as follows : Petitioner in the original petition was working as U.D. Clerk in the Elikulam Gram Panchayat. Petitioner accepted two applications, one from M. K. Gopalan and another from Sherly Emmanuel for regularisation of certain unauthorised construction and issued receipts for entertaining the applications. Panchayat Committee met on 1-7-2000 noticed that the said conduct of the petitioner was unauthorized and illegal. On the basis of the resolution of the Panchayat Committee, President issued an order dated 1-7-2000 placing the petitioner under suspension pending disciplinary proceedings. It is that order which was challenged in the writ petition.

Counsel for the petitioner Sri M. J. Thomas


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top