SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 101

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI, B.N.AGARWAL
Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jayaswants Neco Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Leave granted.

2. (a) What is meant by, "the bank" as mentioned in clause (a) of the proviso to S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?

(b) Does such bank mean the bank of the drawer of the cheque or covers within its ambit any bank including the collecting bank of the payee of the cheque?

(c) To which bank the cheque is to be presented for the purpose of attracting the penal provisions of S.138 of the Act ?

are the questions to be determined by this Court in this appeal.

3. Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Om Prakash v. Gurcharan Singh (1997 (3) Crimes 433 = 1997 ISJ (Banking) 693) and Gujarat High Court in Arunbhai Nikantharai Nanavati v. Jayaben Prahladbhai through her Power of Attorney & Ann (1993 (3) Crimes 252) have held that a cheque must be presented to the bank on which it is drawn within six months from the date of issuance of the cheque. However, Madras High Court in A.B.K. Publications Ltd. & Ors. v. Tamil Nadu Newsprint & Papers Ltd. (1999 (3) Crimes 97) has taken the view that cheque can be presented either in the payee's bank or in the drawer-bank and the date of presentation in respective banks will be reckoned for calculating period of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top