SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 308

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Uniplas India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Judgment :-

1. Leave granted.

2. The drawer of a cheque clutches on a straw for wriggling out of the clinch of a criminal prosecution, he is caught in, but the straw is too fragile to be of any help to him. He thought that a previous notice sent by the payee of the cheque after it was once bounced was enough to knock off the prosecution based on a second presentation and second bouncing of the cheque but neither the trial court nor the High Court favoured the accused in his endeavour to secure a discharge from the case on the said ground. Thus, he has come up with this appeal.

3. Respondent company filed a complaint before the court of a Chief Metropolitan Magistrate against three appellants for the offence under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short'the N.I. Act') on the following inter alia allegations:

The third appellant is the Managing Director of the first appellant company of which the second appellant is Vice President. A cheque in a sum of Rs. 50 Lacs and another cheque for above Rs. 3 Lacs have been drawn by the first appellant in favour of the respondent complainant. The said cheques were presented before the Oriental Bank of Commerce but they were dishonoured




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top