SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 393

G.SASIDHARAN
Kuttappan – Appellant
Versus
Vijayamma – Respondent


Judgment :-

G. Sasidharan, J.

This petition is filed by the respondent in M.C. No. 31 of 1994 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class II, Chengannur. Respondents 1 to 3 herein filed the above case under S.125 Cr. P.C. claiming maintenance. The learned Magistrate passed an order directing the petitioner to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs. 200/-each. The petitioner filed revision in the Additional Sessions Court, Mavelikkara as Crl. R.P. No. 36 of 1996. The above revision was disposed of by the learned Additional Sessions Judge finding that there was no reason for interfering with the order of the learned Magistrate.

2. Respondents 1 to 3 filed an Execution Petition, C.M.P. No. 2755 of 1999 in the Court of the judicial Magistrate of the First Class for realisation of maintenance arrears from 7.5.1996 to 7.7.1999 for respondents 1 and 3 and from 7.5.1996 to 7.11.1997 for the second respondent. The petitioner filed objection to the above petition contending that the Execution Petition is barred by limitation. C.M.P. No. 3224 of 1999 was filed by the petitioner under S.127 Cr. P.C. for altering the order of maintenance on the ground that respondents 2 and 3 had attaine






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top