SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 309

S.SANKARASUBBAN
Praveen Menon – Appellant
Versus
Ajitha K. Pillai – Respondent


Judgment :-

S.Sankarasubban, J :

This C.R.P having been finally heard on 17.7.01, the court on the same day passed the following :

Petitioner challenges the order passed in I.A.No.1337 of 1998 in M.O.P.No.153 of 1997 on the file of the Sub court, Palakkad. In the impugned order, the court has granted maintenance to the wife and child at Rs.500/- and Rs.350/- respectively, and Rs.1000/- towards litigation expenses. By an interim order, this court imposed a condition to deposit an amount of Rs.3,000/-. By another order dated 12.3.1999, the respondents were allowed to withdraw the amount so deposited.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even though under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, a wife is entitled to claim maintenance against the husband, that section does not provide maintenance for any other person. Hence, an order of maintenance cannot be made except for the either of the spouses before the court. Any how, counsel for the petitioner submitted that under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, it is the duty of the father to maintain the minor child and in that view of the matter, the father may be liable to maintain the minor child. Counsel for the petiti



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top