SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 386

A.LEKSHMIKUTTY, S.SANKARASUBBAN
Badagara Jumayath Palli Dharas Committee – Appellant
Versus
Peedikayalakath Ummerkutty Haji – Respondent


Judgment :-

SANKARASUBBAN, J.

This second appeal has been referred to a Division Bench by Krishnan Unni, J. when contention was raised that as per Section 85 of the Wakf Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') Civil Court is barred from considering any question in respect of any dispute, question or other matter relating to any wakf. The facts of the case are as follows :

The appeal arises out of O.S. No. 91 of 1984 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Badagara. Plaintiff in this case is Jumayath Palli Dharas Committee. The suit was filed for declaration of title over the plaint schedule property and recovery of possession on the strength of title and for an injunction restraining the second defendant from demolishing the existing building situated there. The Jumath Palli and Khabarsthan belonged to Peedikayilakath tarwad of which first defendant is the present karanavan. It has been dedicated in wakf with karanavan as its mutawalli. Five members of the said tarwad executed a registered agreement on 13-2-1973 whereby they authorised the plaintiff-Committee to manage the wakf property. It appears, the first defendant executed another document, Ext. A3, on 2-5-1984 in favour of















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top