SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 546

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
Jnana Praksam – Appellant
Versus
Natarajan – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

The question that has come up for consideration in this case is whether a registered headload worker under Kerala Headload Workers Rules could object to the granting of the registration to another headload worker when he makes an application for registration under R.26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules. Learned Single Judge took the view that a registered worker has no such right and he is not an aggrieved party to prefer an appeal under S.26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules against the decision to give registration and identity card. Learned Single Judge upheld the order of the Asst. Labour Officer, Palakkad and set aside the order dated 23.7.2000 of the District Labour Officer, Palakkad. Aggrieved by the same this appeal is preferred.

2. Short facts which are necessary for disposal of this case are as follows: Writ Petitioners are headload workers engaged in loading and unloading work in the Timber Sales Depot of the Forest Department at Walayar in Pudussery Panchayat in Palakkad District. They were granted registration under R.26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981 by the Assistant Labour Officer, Palakkad. They were also issued


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top