SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Ker) 497

Judges : K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
S.N.College - Appellant
Versus
N.Raveendran - Respondent
Case No : O.P. Nos. 19556 & 24581 of 2001
Decided On : 10/24/2001
Advocates Appeared :
A.N. Rajan Babu & P. Santhosh Kumar For Petitioners S. Gopakumaran Nair, V. Jayapradeep & Government Pleader For Respondents

Headnote:

Kerala University Act 1974, Ss. 57 & 58 - College - Tribunal - Challenged - This court dismissed Writ Petition - Second respondent filed which was heard along with other two appeals - Division Bench did not examine legality or otherwise of selection which was set aside by Tribunal but on an agreed order Writ Appeal was disposed - In other words counsel submitted illegality found by Tribunal still stands and consequently this court could examine question whether second respondent was qualified to hold the post of Special Grade Principal - Held, On basis of that judgment University of Calicut vide its order has already approved the appointment of second respondent as Principal of S.N. College Lather with effect approval has not been challenged - This Court in this case is not justified in examining validity or otherwise of those proceedings especially since said order was passed in pursuance of order of Division Bench - Under above mentioned circumstances court are inclined to allow both these Writ Petitions - Petition allowed

Judgment :-

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

The order of the Kerala University Appellate Tribunal dated 20.6.2001 is under challenge in both these Writ Petitions. O.P. 19556/01 is preferred by the Manager of S.N. College and O.P. 24581/01 is filed by the Principal of S.N. College, Kollam. First respondent herein appraoched the University Appellate Tribunal challenging the order dated 1.9.2000 by which the second respondent was appointed as the Principal of S.N. College, Kollam. Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the order dated 1.9.2000 and gave a direction to appoint the first respondent as Principal of S.N. College, Kollam. Aggrieved by the same these Writ Petitions are preferred.

2. S.N. College is a Special Grade College under the management of S.N. Trust. One Prof. Vijayan had occupied the post of Principal of S.N. College, Kollam. While he was on leave the second respondent herein was put in charge of the Principal of S.N. College, Kollam. First respondent herein who at that time serving as Principal of Sree Narayana Guru College, Chelannur filed O.P. No. 12665/2000 seeking a direction to the Management to appoint him as Principal of S.N. College, Kollom. Writ Petition was disposed of by this Court on 27.6.2000 directing the management to appoint a duly qualified and suitable incumbent to the post of Principal, S.N. College, Kollam within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment. Management therefore passed order dated 1.9.2000 promoting the second respondent as Special Grade Principal and posted in the same college. It is that order which was challenged before the Tribunal.

3. Counsel appearing for the first respondent Sri. R. Krishna Raj submitted that University Appellate Tribunal was justified in interfering with the order passed by the Management dated 1.9.2000 by which the second respondent was promoted and appointed as Principal of the Special Grade S.N. College, Kollam. According to him the second respondent does not possess the requisite qualification as laid down in the U.G.C. Scheme of 1998 so as to be appointed as Principal of the Special Grade College. Counsel submitted the U.G.C. Scheme of 1998 was implemented by Government of Kerala as per GO (P) No. 171/H Edn. dt. 21.12.1999 by which the qualification prescribed for appointment as Principal of Special Grade College is a Masters Degree with atleast 55% marks with Ph.D. or its equivalent qualification with a total experience of 15 years of teaching/ research. According to him second respondent did not possess the said qualification. According to the counsel, after the implementation of U.G.C. Scheme 1998 all the college teachers of private colleges are being paid salary in the pay scale of private teachers prescribed in the U.G.C. Scheme of 1998. The payment in the pay scale prescribed by the U.G.C. Scheme of 1998 is effected since U.G.C. Scheme of 1998 was implemented by notification dated 21.12.1999. Counsel made reference to a letter dated 25.11.1999 issued by the University Grants Commission wherein it was stated that Ph.D. shall remain as the essential qualification for appointment as Principal though those qualifications are not applicable to the incumbents who were appointed as Principals prior to 24.12.1998. Reference was also made to statement made by U.G.C. in C.C.C. 721/2000 wherein it has been categorically stated by the University Grants Commission that in the event of the failure of the University to comply with the UGC Regulations, the UGC can initiate action under the provisions of S.14 of the UGC Act, 1956 withholding from the University the grants proposed to be made out of the fund of the commission.

4. Counsel also submitted that second respondent was not even qualified to be appointed as Principal even as per qualification existed prior to the implementation of the U.G.C. Scheme of 1998. It was pointed out the selection of the second respondent and certain others were challenged by one Sreedharan, Lecturer, Sele





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top